Critical thinking reading and writing a brief guide to argument Auestad May 06, Organized around us by stipulation.
Critical Thinking, Reading, and Writing: A Brief Guide to Argument Argument vs. However, upon further review and analysis, it is apparent that although these books originate from the same publisher and cover similar topic areas, they are in fact quite different from each other.
By comparing and contrasting the content, organization, explanations, readings, examples, graphics, and layout of these books, it will be apparent that these books are quite different from one another.
A Brief Guide to Argument covers a broad range of aspects of argument. For example, it focuses on three major categories to cover argument: Critical Thinking, Reading, and Writing. It is obvious from this statement that this book is not just about argument—there is more to be covered in it.
Part one focuses on teaching the reader to understand how to think and read critically as a standing ground for teaching about the methods of argument. It assumes that before one can fully understand argument, one must first understand how to read and think critically. The third part focuses on expanding views of argument.
It appears that the content of the book builds in emphatic order—the most important topics are covered last.
It assumes that to advance to the next chapter and the next part of the book, the reader must hold an understanding of the previous chapters and previous parts of the book. We have also introduced two elements of argument with which Toulmin is not directly concerned….
The Structure of Argument is primarily focused in presenting argument. It divides its content into two main parts: The book does a great job describing its organization and content: So while A Brief Guide to Argument covers critical thinking, reading, and writing separately as it pertains to argumentThe Structure of Argument only focuses on introducing and teaching aspects of argument in specific.
The Structure of Argument, rather than building in emphatic order in its organization, integrates its content to provide the background necessary to teach argument. For example, A Brief Guide to Argument devotes two chapters on teaching how to read critically, while The Structure of Argument uses sample readings at the end of each chapter to integrate critical reading and understanding into its content.
It is also important to note that these two offer different ranges of material in relation to argument. To further expound my argument, I will next consider the explanations and readings in each of the books to show how they differ from one another in this aspect.
In The Structure of Argument, Rottenberg and Winchell use a preponderance of textual explanations in making their points.
For example, in a given chapter, the authors divide the material into sub-sections. Why has this audience requested this report?
What do they want to get out of it? How much do they already know about the subject? There are also readings at the end of each chapter that relate to the overall topic in the chapter.
There are about five readings per chapter that range from popular historical essays such as The Declaration of Independence to A Modest Proposal by Jonathan Swift a popular satirical essay.
In most cases, the essays are analyzed in terms of what is covered in the corresponding chapter; this is usually followed by discussion questions. For example, the text breaks down the Declaration of Independence into definition, claim, support, warrant, logic, and language—all aspects covered in the chapter.
Breaking down essays into components covered in the chapter makes it easier to apply the knowledge gained in the chapter to real-life situations. I will further discuss this in detail in the next couple of paragraphs. I will now draw my attention to the explanations and readings in A Brief Guide to Argument to show how it differs from The Structure of Argument.Critical thinking — in being responsive to variable subject matter, issues, and purposes — is incorporated in a family of interwoven modes of thinking, among them: scientific thinking, mathematical thinking, historical thinking, anthropological thinking, economic thinking, moral thinking, and philosophical thinking.
Critical Thinking, Reading, and Writing: A Brief Guide to Argument, , pages, Sylvan Barnet, Hugo Bedau, , , Bedford/St. Martin's. Critical Thinking, Reading, and Writing: A Brief Guide to Argument Sylvan Barnet Hugo Bedau Bedford/St.
Martin's / Paperback / Pages isbn / isbn / Edition: Seventh Book / Textbook Details Add to Comparison Cart. Buy Critical Thinking, Reading, and Writing: A Brief Guide to Argument at caninariojana.com • Brief summary of the article’s content/theme. • Summary of the author’s main claim/thesis (if you do not believe the author is making an argument, so state).
The unique collaborative effort of a professor of English, a professor of philosophy, and now a professor of critical thinking, Critical Thinking, Reading, and Writing is a compact but complete guide to critical thinking and argumentation.